Opponents ask court to stop Turk plant

Yellow Pages

By Staff reports
Posted May 25, 2010 @ 04:27 PM
Print Comment

 

Arguing that continued construction of the John W. Turk, Jr., Power Plant at Fulton will irreparably harm not only the local, but state and worldwide environment, opponents of the $1.7 billion AEP/Southwestern Electric Power Co. project have asked a federal judge to stop its construction permanently.

In filings before U. S. District Judge Harry F. Barnes in a lawsuit brought in February against the U. S. Corps of Engineers, the Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Audubon Arkansas, and two individuals sought Friday to have Barnes shut down construction of the plant and idle hundreds of workers.

The construction of the pumping station on the Little River; construction of pipelines, ditches and channels; the filling of wetlands; the construction of electrical transmission lines; the rerouting of roads; construction of rail lines; the shipment, storage and burning of coal; and other activities necessary and appurtenant to the construction and operation of the Plant will be taken at potentially grave risk of irreparable harm to the water quality, water quantity, air quality, scenic beauty, wildlife, fish and environment, and will cause substantial and irreparable harm to the ecosystem of the Little River and its basin and surrounding areas, the State of Arkansas, the nation and the world through permanent modification and alteration of lowlands vegetation, destruction of wetlands, degradation of water quality, destruction of fish and wildlife habitat, emission of pollutants such as mercury, carbon dioxide, and other pollutants and contaminants, causing irreparable adverse impacts without full consideration of the environmental impacts of such actions as required by law,” the filing states.

Opponents argue that SWEPCO essentially held sway over the COE in obtaining a Department of the Army Permit Evaluation and Decision Document (PEDD) in contravention of the National Environmental Policy Act and its implementing regulations, the Clean Water Act, and other federal law and reglations.

Opponents seek to have Barnes restrain and enjoin SWEPCO from “any activities regarding construction on or implementation of the John Turk, Jr., Project...;” seeking expedited consideration and hearing of the motion, and an order to “cease and desist from implementation of the Project...;” along with the award of court costs and attorney fees.

The filing and the original lawsuit specifically involve about 10.47 acres of property within the 2,800-acre SWEPCO site and approximately 8,150 linear feet along the Little River.

In arguing the motion, opponents point out that the CEO relied upon data and information compiled by SWEPCO for state permit filings to make a decision, which opponents say, was part of a strategy by the company.

 

Arguing that continued construction of the John W. Turk, Jr., Power Plant at Fulton will irreparably harm not only the local, but state and worldwide environment, opponents of the $1.7 billion AEP/Southwestern Electric Power Co. project have asked a federal judge to stop its construction permanently.

In filings before U. S. District Judge Harry F. Barnes in a lawsuit brought in February against the U. S. Corps of Engineers, the Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Audubon Arkansas, and two individuals sought Friday to have Barnes shut down construction of the plant and idle hundreds of workers.

The construction of the pumping station on the Little River; construction of pipelines, ditches and channels; the filling of wetlands; the construction of electrical transmission lines; the rerouting of roads; construction of rail lines; the shipment, storage and burning of coal; and other activities necessary and appurtenant to the construction and operation of the Plant will be taken at potentially grave risk of irreparable harm to the water quality, water quantity, air quality, scenic beauty, wildlife, fish and environment, and will cause substantial and irreparable harm to the ecosystem of the Little River and its basin and surrounding areas, the State of Arkansas, the nation and the world through permanent modification and alteration of lowlands vegetation, destruction of wetlands, degradation of water quality, destruction of fish and wildlife habitat, emission of pollutants such as mercury, carbon dioxide, and other pollutants and contaminants, causing irreparable adverse impacts without full consideration of the environmental impacts of such actions as required by law,” the filing states.

Opponents argue that SWEPCO essentially held sway over the COE in obtaining a Department of the Army Permit Evaluation and Decision Document (PEDD) in contravention of the National Environmental Policy Act and its implementing regulations, the Clean Water Act, and other federal law and reglations.

Opponents seek to have Barnes restrain and enjoin SWEPCO from “any activities regarding construction on or implementation of the John Turk, Jr., Project...;” seeking expedited consideration and hearing of the motion, and an order to “cease and desist from implementation of the Project...;” along with the award of court costs and attorney fees.

The filing and the original lawsuit specifically involve about 10.47 acres of property within the 2,800-acre SWEPCO site and approximately 8,150 linear feet along the Little River.

In arguing the motion, opponents point out that the CEO relied upon data and information compiled by SWEPCO for state permit filings to make a decision, which opponents say, was part of a strategy by the company.

SWEPCO 'steamrolled' the Turk Project and the COE with its arrogant assumption that a Section 404 permit would be issued, and its strategy to construct as much of the plant as possible so that it could them claim that it would suffer financial hardship when this Court reviewed irregularities in the permitting process,” the opponents' brief in argument states.

They argue that the COE will not be harmed by a decision to halt construction, and that any harm to SWEPCO will have been “...self-inflicted, the result of an improper decision to steamroll the implementation of its plans.”

Pointing to federal case law defining the tests for granting of a preliminary injunction, opponents argue in an 80-page filing that continued construction of the plant poses a threat of irreparable harm; will not harm COE, and will harm SWEPCO only to the extent that the company was already warned by COE of the danger of starting construction prior to having a PEDD; that there is a substantial probability opponents will prevail on the merits; and, that the public interest will be served by stopping construction of the plant.

SWEPCO spokesman Peter Main said this morning that the company is studying the filing.

Certainly, we're aware of what was filed Friday, and we intend to respond within the 14 days allowed by law,” Main said.

He said the company had not yet decided how it will respond to an Arkansas Supreme Court ruling May 13 which overturned the Arkansas Public Service Commission approval of a public needs certificate for the Turk Plant. The company and the PSC have until June 1 to seek a rehearing before the Court.

Loading commenting interface...

Site Services
Contact Us
Announcements
Online Forms
Place an Ad
Market Place
Shopping
Classifieds
Jobs
Let's Go Shopping
Boats Magazine
Lifestyle
Family
Food
Health
Home and Garden